You win,
then we win.
No fat monthly retainer. ReplyLead runs on a revenue-share model, so most of our pay is tied to the pipeline we actually produce. Our incentives sit on the same side of the table as yours.
The revenue-share model, in three steps.
Simple, aligned, and built so we only win meaningfully when you close revenue.
Step 01
Align
We agree your ICP, offer, and a clear attribution model up front, based on the meetings we book and the deals that close from them. No guesswork later.
Step 02
Launch
We build the full engine: dedicated infrastructure, ICP-matched lists, split-tested copy, and warmed inboxes, then start booking qualified meetings onto your calendar. This is outbound run end to end.
Step 03
Share
You close the pipeline we generate, and we earn our agreed share of that revenue. Most of our pay rides on results, so we push for meetings that turn into deals.
Retainer vs revenue share.
The honest question is not which is cheapest, it is who carries the risk in a quarter where nothing closes.
Traditional retainer agency
- xLarge fixed fee every month, results or not
- xFee covers the agreed scope or capacity
- xReview delivery commitments and credits
- xAssess reporting, service quality and incentives
ReplyLead revenue share
- +Most of our pay is tied to closed revenue
- +Paid for booked meetings that become deals
- +We carry the performance risk with you
- +One shared goal: pipeline that closes
The whole engine, nothing to assemble.
Beyond the revenue share, campaigns run on dedicated sending infrastructure that carries a monthly technology fee, the only fixed cost. The ROI calculator itemizes every tool and its cost at your sending volume, right next to your projected return. You can also read the deliverability guide or see why teams choose ReplyLead. For how these numbers compare with retainer and pay-per-meeting agencies, see what a cold email agency really costs.
What does the money actually buy?
The reporting to agree before launch
Agree the evidence and stage definitions before forecasting results or calculating revenue share. Ask for a dated reporting period, distinct outcomes and an attribution rule. Reply counts alone do not establish meetings held, accepted opportunities or closed revenue.
| Stage | Evidence to request | Acceptance rule |
|---|---|---|
| Campaign delivery | Dated activity and reply reporting | Define the reporting period and separate automatic responses from interest. |
| Booked meeting | Confirmed calendar event and thread context | Record target fit, attendee role and the agreed reason for the conversation. |
| Held meeting | Attendance status and call notes | Count attended meetings separately from bookings; define reschedules and no-shows. |
| Accepted opportunity | Sales acceptance in your CRM | Your sales team applies the written qualification criteria. |
| Attributed closed revenue | Closed-deal record and agreed payment evidence | Apply the attribution window, exclusions and revenue-share terms in your agreement. |
How the four pricing models actually differ
The honest question is not which is cheapest, it is who carries the risk in a quarter where nothing closes.
| Model | You pay for | A quarter where nothing closes |
|---|---|---|
| Flat retainer | Defined service scope or capacity | The fixed fee remains, subject to credits, variable charges and cancellation terms. |
| Pay per appointment | The booked, held or accepted event specified in the agreement | Payment follows the contract; no-show, rejection and replacement terms affect cost. |
| Pay per lead | The delivered unit and acceptance criteria specified in the agreement | Payment follows the contract; duplicate, rejection and credit terms affect cost. |
| ReplyLead: infrastructure + revenue share | A lean monthly amount, plus a share of what closes | No revenue share owed; the infrastructure amount remains |
This is shared risk, not pure contingency: the infrastructure amount covers real mailboxes, domains and verification that exist either way. Every tier is published on what a cold email agency costs, and the mechanics are on this page.
What you are buying, itemised
| Component | What it covers | How it is charged |
|---|---|---|
| Sending infrastructure | Dedicated mailboxes and sending domains, warmup, the email sequencer, live list verification, data and enrichment tools | Lean monthly amount, published by volume tier |
| The team and the work | ICP definition, list build, copy, testing, reply handling, qualification, booking | Recovered through the revenue share |
| Outcome | Qualified meetings that convert to closed revenue | Agreed share of what actually closes |
This page covers how ReplyLead prices. For what agencies in this category charge generally, including the seven-tier fee table in full, see how much a cold email agency costs.
- The model
- Two parts: a lean monthly infrastructure amount plus an agreed revenue share. No large fixed retainer, no per-meeting fee.
- Infrastructure amount
- $2,023 to $44,090 a month across seven published volume tiers, set by send volume.
- Revenue share
- An agreed share of revenue that closes from meetings we book - percentage and attribution window set on the intro call.
- If nothing closes
- No revenue share is owed. The infrastructure amount remains, because mailboxes, domains and verification are real costs either way.
- The work itself
- ICP, lists, copy, testing, reply handling, qualification and booking are recovered through the share, not billed as a retainer.
- Full tier table
- Published in full on what a cold email agency costs, itemised at your volume in the ROI calculator.
Straight answers on cost.
How much does ReplyLead cost?
Is there a setup or technology fee?
How is the revenue share calculated?
Why revenue share instead of a flat retainer?
Who is a good fit for this model?
Is there a long-term contract?
How do I get a quote?
Pricing that rewards results.
Tell us your offer and deal size, and we will show you exactly how the revenue share would work. No retainer to lose.
Apply to work with usRelated: how pay per lead agencies price // what other outsourced SDR providers charge // what “sales as a service” actually covers
Compare providers. Compare this model with the B2B lead generation companies, the sales outsourcing companies and the appointment setting companies on their published prices.